You will either have to wait for an update from Nvidia or switch to the regular GeForce drivers, which work as well.
Only brand-new titles sometimes require a newer driver version.
We just saw that the performance of the professional GPU is just behind a regular GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and the drivers are not a big problem either (which was not the case a few years ago). The Quadro P5000 is basically also a good choice for gaming. This is the case in some sub tests, but they can be found at the bottom of the rankings in others. We added some consumer models, which have better specifications and should be faster. The influence of the drivers is easily visible on the comparison chart for SPECviewperf 12. The advantage over the other Pascal GPUs is only minor in some cases and certainly does not justify the enormous price difference, while the P5000 is much faster in other tests. The results are quite interesting, and we can clearly see that the P5000 is not the best choice for every application. We use the benchmarks SPECviewperf 11 & 12, which cover scenarios such as CAD, CAM, geology, and medical applications (MRI). Drivers can result in enormous performance gains, especially in OpenGL optimized software. The professional Quadro GPUs are equipped with special drivers and ISV certifications to ensure compatibility with professional applications. 1645 MHz), so the performance should be slightly lower. The lower clock of the P5000 is another difference (1164 - 1506 MHz vs. It is based on Nvidia's Pascal architecture and can be compared with the consumer GeForce GTX 1070, but Nvidia has equipped the P5000 with twice the amount of VRAM (16 GB GDDR5). Nvidia's Quadro P5000 automatically kicks in when you need more performance. This creates less heat (less fan activity) and the power consumption is lower. We recommend checking our review of the old Precision 7710 for more information on the case, the connectivity, the input devices, and the speakers.ĭell's Precision 7720 supports Nvidia's Optimus technology, so simple workloads are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics P630 of the processor. The basic construction has not changed, which is why we will not cover all the sections in this review and focus on the new components instead. The competition for the Precision 7720 traditionally includes the Lenovo ThinkPad P71 as well as HP's ZBook 17 G4, but we also include the corresponding systems from Fujitsu ( Celsius H970) as well as MSI ( WE72). This results in a price of almost 5500 Euros (~$6836 plus VAT), and the GPU is the biggest price factor.
Our test model, which was provided by Dell, is well equipped including Xeon E3-1535M v6, 64 GB of RAM, the modern Nvidia Quadro P5000 with 16 GB of VRAM, and a high-resolution 4K PremierColor display, which promises full AdobeRGB gamut. Currently it starts at around 2200 Euros (~$2735), but can you quickly get into the five-figure range when you check all the boxes (plus VAT). However, this also creates a huge price margin. Fast CPU with small dGPU, or vice versa – no problem. It is no problem to create a model perfectly suited for your requirements. Its predecessor Precision 7710 also managed a good score in our review.Īs per usual in this segment, Dell offers many different components and individual configurations. This is also the case for our test model today, the Dell Precision 7720. However, last year's models were hardly disappointing, so there is no criticism from our side. Instead, we get evolutionary approaches that are mainly limited to the components. The market for big mobile workstations (17-inch) is not that interesting this year, because none of the major manufacturers have introduced new models.